Online First

To perform this study, the researchers targeted undergraduates of university K, distributing 800 questionnaires, which is equivalent to 10 percent of all students of university K, who can be users of central library. We directly distributed the questionnaire and surveyed the extracted sample respondents. The questionnaire cover letter included the purpose of the research and survey, and also a simple statement informing them that they are the extracted samples. Afterwards, respondents had an understanding of the survey through the cover letter, and then participated in the survey voluntarily. As a result, the number of collected questionnaires from the total distributed 800 was 184, the response rate was 23%. The survey period was from May 1 through 30, 2011.

Answered and returned questionnaires were coded for each question. The primary coded data was contrasted with the original questionnaires for accuracy once again. Through a review process, primary coded data and secondary reviewed data were completed. For statistical analysis, statistical package SPSS (PASW Statistics 18) was used. For each question of the survey, frequency analysis and descriptive statistics were calculated.

The survey questions are composed of 5 sections and 21 questions. The 5 sections are about respondents' demographic information, users' library using patterns, user satisfaction, the libraries' functionality, user training, and other comments. Contents and configuration of the questionnaire are as follows in Table 1.

In this part, we presented the gender, year, and school of study of K university library's users. The following Table 3 is about year by gender. Comparing the gender of respondents, the number of male respondents was 72 to 112 female respondents, meaning female respondents were higher than men by approximately 20%. The distribution of year ranges from17.4% (Year 2) to 33.7% (Year 4); it can be said the number of respondents by year are distributed evenly.

The following Table 3 shows the distribution of respondents by colleges. K University’s six colleges were surveyed for this study. When comparing the number of respondents by colleges, College of Humanities was the highest with 39.7%, and College of Global Studies was the lowest with 6.5%. When separated by gender, female respondents in college of Humanities were examined most with 51 respondents (27.7%).

The following Table 4 is the correlation table between Year and Colleges. The college and year showing the highest response rate were 4^th Year in college of Humanities, followed by the 3^rd Year in the same college. College of Art & Design showed the lowest response rate.

The following Table 5 is about the frequency which K University users visit and use the central library. The question asking about their library visit frequency was composed of 5 possible responses: 1-3 times a week, 4 or more times a week, 1-3 times a month, 1-3 times in one semester, and never use. The ‘never use’ response was zero, so four responses were analyzed.

In analysis of ‘frequency of library visits’, ‘1-3 times a week’ is the most frequently chosen, ‘1-3 times in one semester’ was the least. Overall, it can be said that the frequency of library visits were on the high side.

When analyzing ‘frequency of library visit’ by gender, the number of respondents answering that they use the library in ‘1-3 times a week’, was the highest with 50.5% (93 respondents). It was followed by ‘more than 4 times a week’ with 41 respondents (22.3 percent), ‘1-3 times per month’ with 40 (21.7%), ‘1-3 times in one semester’ with 10 people (5.4 percent). Overall, female users (60.9%) visited the library more frequently compared to male with 3.91%. Especially, the female response rate answering ‘1-3 times a week’ was the highest.

When analyzing by year, the highest number of respondents was 4^th year (62 respondents, 33.7%), followed by 3^rd year (25.8%), 1^st year (23.9%), and 2^nd year (25.0%). And In the cross-analysis of year and frequency of visits, the highest point is the 4th year responding ‘1-3 times a week’ (35 respondents, 19.0%).

When analyzing the frequency of library visits by colleges, the college of Humanities recording 39.7% (73 respondents) showed the highest, followed by college of Social Science with 20.1% (37), college of Natural Science with 15.2% (28). College of Global Studies showed the lowest visit rate. In the cross-analysis of colleges and frequency of visits, the highest point is the college of Humanities responding ‘1-3 times a week’ (35 respondents, 19.0%).

The users’ purpose in using the library was surveyed, allowing them to choose three of the many possible responses. As a result, the total number of responses was 436. The results are summarized in Table 6.

The primary purpose of using the academic library was circulation (31.9%), followed by study subjects, homework (17.7%), class (lecture) preparation (11.5%), and reading books/journal/magazines (10.1%). All of the above purposes are items associated with learning or reading, therefore it can be said that users' library using purposes are related to learning and reading. On the other hand, the rate of respondents who visit the library to meet friends or to make use of facilities, or for leisure, was very low (about 5%).

The following Table 7 is the results of question items that asked which space respondents use most. The number of respondents with ‘no answer’ was recorded. As a result, the most used library space was ‘resource reading room’ (53.8%), followed by ‘multimedia information square’ (17.4%), ‘reading room’ (12.5%), and ‘job library’ (10.3%). On the other hand, the most unused space was ‘group study room’ and ‘serials room’, both were 2.2%. The main reason why the serials room is not used is most likely because most serials' articles can be accessed online due to the development of information technology.

When analyzing ‘the most used library space’ by gender, it was found that female users used the following library spaces often: Resource reading room, Multimedia information square, and Reading room. On the other hand, male users used the following library spaces often: Resource reading room, Reading room, and Multimedia information square.

When analyzing ‘the most used library space’ by year, it was found that ‘Resource reading room’ was the highest used library space for most years. When analyzing it by colleges, ‘Resource reading room’ was the highest used library space for most of the colleges. It was found that students in the College of Biomedical & Health Science, compared to other colleges, used ‘Multimedia information square’ and ‘Job Library’ in particular.

Allowing the user to choose three possible responses, it was surveyed which materials they used most commonly in the library. As a result, the total number of responses was 305, excluding the ‘no response’. The results are summarized in Table 8.

The rate of respondents answering that they mainly used ‘general books’ is the highest (53.1%), followed by thesis (11.1%), Electronic Information and Audio-visual material (both 10.8%). The response rate for ‘reference materials’ was the lowest.

The following Table 9 is the results of question items that concern the most preferred way to obtain needed materials when failing to find the wanted materials. As a result, the rate of respondents answering that they mainly contact librarians is the highest (24.5%), followed by ‘Request for Library Purchase’ (19.6%), and ‘Abandon’ (14.7%). ‘Asking friends and professor’ was the lowest (5.4%).

When analyzing how to obtain ‘Non-collection resources’ by gender, it seems that both female and male users most preferred to contact librarians. However, as a second priority, female users preferred to request for library purchase, but males preferred to search for related materials.

When analyzing how to obtain ‘Non-collection resources’ by year, it was analyzed that abandonment by low-years is significantly higher. As can be seen from Table 9, the higher the year, the rate to take active solutions increases gradually.

When analyzing the results by colleges, students in colleges of Humanities, Social Science, and Natural Sciences seem to acquire their needed resources within the library more actively. On the other hand, students in colleges of Art & Design, Biomedical &Health Science, and Global Studies seem reluctant to obtain needed resources within the library. The rate of abandonment was very high.

The following Table 10 is the results of question items regarding the most preferred way to know how to use library facilities. As a result, the rate of respondents answering that they mainly contact librarians is the highest (46.2%), followed by ‘refer to library guide’ (20.1%), and ‘no difficulty’ (15.8%). The rate of ‘asking nearby users’ was the lowest at 7.6%. The rate at which’ abandoned the use of facilities’ was chosen is not low at almost 10%.

When analyzing results by gender, year, and colleges, ‘How to know how to use the facility’ was showing a similar phenomenon with the above ‘how to get the resources’.

The following Table 11 is about ‘user satisfaction with the lending period’. According to the current library regulations, the loan period for undergraduate students is 7 days.

As a result, it was shown that the loan period that users preferred most was 10 days (43.5%), followed by 15 days (35.3%), and 20 days (10.9%). A similar phenomenon appeared in results comparing by gender, year, and colleges. However, it was shown that students of Colleges of Natural Sciences, Biomedical & Health Science favored a long load period of 20 days the most highly.

The following Table 12 is about ‘user satisfaction with number of borrowed books’. According to the current library regulations, the number of borrowed books allowed for undergraduate students is 7 volumes.

Results showed that users were satisfied with the current limit of volumes for borrowing. A similar phenomenon appeared in results comparing by gender, year, and colleges. However, it was shown that students of Colleges of Biomedical & Health Science favored less volumes (5 volumes) for borrowing the most highly.

The items for investigating satisfaction of library services are four as follows: ‘Librarians’, ‘User services’, ‘Document delivery and interlibrary loan’, ‘homepage configuration and use’, and ‘opening hours’. User satisfaction of library services was surveyed by a Likert five-point scale. As a result, It was shown that they were satisfied with librarians’ user services at 52.2%, ‘document delivery and interlibrary loan’ at 41.3%, and ‘opening hours’ at 38%. However, dissatisfaction about ‘opening hours’ was significantly higher at 28.8%.

The items for investigating satisfaction of collection’s recency are six as follows in Table 14. User satisfaction with it was surveyed by a Likert five-point scale. ‘Recency of general books’ showed the highest satisfaction at 64.6%. On the other hand, ‘Recency of audio-visual materials’ showed the lowest satisfaction compared to the others.

The items for investigating satisfaction with the collection’s diversity are six as follows in Table 15. User satisfaction with it was surveyed by a Likert five-point scale. ‘Diversity of general books’ showed the highest satisfaction at 59.3%. On the other hand, ‘Diversity of audio-visual materials’ showed the lowest satisfaction compared to the others. It was found that the satisfaction with the collection's diversity was relatively low.

The items for investigating satisfaction with ‘Facilities and Environment’ are shown in the following Table 16. User satisfaction with them was surveyed by a Likert five-point scale. User satisfaction with facilities and environment was very low, excepting the ‘Loan Desk’. Especially, satisfaction with the Reading Room, Study Room, Soundproofing, and Air conditioning was very low. Therefore, the library needs to make an effort to improve the library’s circumstance and facilities.

The items for investigating the need for additional space are as follows in Table 17. As a result, ‘Book Cafe & Relaxation space’ showed the highest demand at 38.6%, followed by ‘Study room & discussion area’ (18.5%), and ‘Cultural Program Space’ (16.3%).

In the section surveying user training, questions about number of user education, user education awareness, and awareness of the need for user education were investigated. As shown in Table 18, the rate of users who don't know if there is user education was very high at 70.7%. The rate of users who have no experience with user education was 83.7%.

We analyzed by cross-analysis to investigate whether or not there are any relationships between these two variables. As shown in Table 18, users who don't know about the library's user education program have never been trained at the library. However, the approximately 40% of users who know about it did not receive user education. This means that the library does not make enough effort to promote their user education services.

The following Table 19 is the results of surveying the users' awareness of user education's necessity. 63.1% respondents answered that user education programs are necessary, 17.4% of them said that they are strongly needed. Users responding that user education programs are not necessary were only 4.4%. Therefore, libraries are required to provide user education programs more actively. In addition, users who know about the user education program responded that user education programs are required. 41% of users not knowing about the user education program responded that user education programs are required.

In addition, requirements that users commented upon at the questionnaire question ‘Other suggestions’ are summarized as follows:

① lack of recent data

② Homepage renewal

③ Replacing and expanding facilities (tables, chairs, computers, cooling and heating)

④ Extending the library opening hours

⑤ Lack of user education

⑥ Lack of staff’s kindness

⑦ Lack of reading room

⑧ Establishing the lounge for relaxation

⑨ Supplement of major publications

⑩ Improve cleanliness

⑪ Lack of study rooms

⑫ Not well soundproofed

⑬ Improving the service process and speed

⑭ Old compared to the other campuses

⑮ New library building